U.S. Military Basic Robert B. Abrams speaks with Korean and U.S. officers on the Joint Safety Space in Panmunjom, Republic of Korea, November 10, 2018. (Sergeant Michael Roach/US Military)
On U.S. commanders, Saudi Arabia, soccer, and extra
Some individuals assume that generals ought to be seen and never heard — or perhaps not even seen. There’s protocol to be adopted, for positive. However I typically prefer it when our generals are heard. And I used to be glad to examine Vincent Brooks, an Military common.
I’ll quote an article from the Agence France-Presse:
The outgoing commander of US forces in South Korea on Thursday urged Seoul and Washington to take care of their alliance as variations mount of their strategy to the nuclear-armed North.
Brooks spoke at a change-of-command ceremony. (Transcript right here.) I’ll do some extra quoting.
“On this place, we’ve by no means succeeded by going alone,” Brooks stated. (He was talking in South Korea, at Camp Humphreys.) “We’ve got all the time succeeded once we went collectively — crossing the river in the identical boat …”
Reflecting on his expiring tenure, Brooks stated, “We grew stronger underneath the exams and strains that confronted us, opposite to predictions of cracks and fissures. Let this be a lesson to all within the alliance.”
The alliance between the USA and South Korea is a vital one certainly.
Brooks stated, “We’d like not worry something once we are collectively, sharing the hazards and the thrill alike. However our fears and considerations ought to rise if we turn into inclined to go our personal means.”
The AFP article famous that Basic Brooks as soon as described his tenure as “a rollercoaster experience.” He had no indication that President Trump, after his summit with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un final summer time, would announce the cancelation of joint army workouts between the U.S. and the South. Trump referred to as these workouts “very provocative,” in addition to “tremendously costly.”
In any occasion, Trump is the commander-in-chief, and, because the AFP reported, “the allies have since suspended most of their main joint workouts.”
The incoming commander in South Korea — Vincent Brooks’s successor — testified earlier than the Senate that there has “definitely” been “a degradation within the readiness” of the joint forces, owing to this suspension of workouts. However he’s assured that the forces can get again on monitor. (For an article in Stars and Stripes, go right here.)
This new commander, by the way, is Robert B. Abrams — son of the person for whom the tank is known as.
The Korean Peninsula is among the touchiest, most harmful locations on earth, and I just like the sound of our army commanders, frankly. Civilian leaders should have management, ever and all the time. Nevertheless it’s good when the army males present sense and backbone.
Have you learnt what I imply? Generals and admirals shouldn’t be celebrities, in all probability — besides in uncommon circumstances (Stormin’ Norman within the Gulf!). Nevertheless it doesn’t harm the general public to know a bit about them.
• You’ll keep in mind “Operation Trustworthy Patriot,” the army deployment to our southern border shortly earlier than the midterm elections. An article in Politico begins,
The 5,800 troops who have been rushed to the southwest border amid President Donald Trump’s pre-election warnings a few refugee caravan will begin coming residence as early as this week — simply as a few of these migrants are starting to reach.
Huh. Then why have been they despatched within the first place? Are you able to blame individuals who suspect this may need been a political choice, or stunt, somewhat than an trustworthy army choice?
• I’m wondering when you noticed this story (Wall Road Journal) about our Saudi allies. It reviews,
At the very least eight of the 18 ladies’s-rights activists detained by Saudi authorities this yr have been tortured, together with no less than 4 who have been subjected to electrical shocks and lashings, in response to two advisers to the Saudi royal household …
Positive. Par for the course.
• Requested who ought to be held accountable for the homicide of Jamal Khashoggi, the Saudi journalist who had fled to the USA, President Trump stated, “Perhaps the world must be held accountable, as a result of the world is a vicious place.”
Forgive some gallows humor, however I can think about younger individuals, confronted by their mother and father for some wrongdoing: “Look, perhaps the world ought to be held accountable, as a result of the world is a vicious place.”
• Jackson Diehl, the deputy editorial-page editor of the Washington Submit, wrote a column about Trump, Saudi Arabia, and the Khashoggi killing. (Jamal Khashoggi wrote for the Submit.) Diehl’s column says the required, I feel. I strongly advocate it (right here).
Let me quote a single portion:
The USA has all the time tolerated human rights abuses by pleasant dictators, however there have been limits — as Chile’s Augusto Pinochet, the shah of Iran and, extra just lately, Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak found. By refusing to impose sanctions on the Saudi crown prince even after the CIA concluded he was liable for the Khashoggi homicide, Trump has set a brand new commonplace. No atrocity is an excessive amount of — not even sawing up a important journalist after which baldly mendacity about it to the president and secretary of state.
The ensuing open season on dissidents, journalists and human rights activists by regimes that used to fret about U.S. response will probably be compounded by a second Trump message: Abductions and murders in different nations at the moment are okay.
• Fred Ryan put out a robust assertion. He’s the writer of the Washington Submit, and he was chief of employees to Ronald Reagan, after Reagan left workplace. Ryan’s assertion is right here, and I’ll quote simply two sentences: “President Trump is right in saying the world is a really harmful place. His give up to this state-ordered homicide will solely make it extra so.”
• That is one in every of my issues with the “realists,” so referred to as. They appear to not understand that they often make the world a extra harmful place by refusing to carry malefactors accountable for his or her actions. This provides these malefactors a inexperienced mild for extra abuse. There isn’t any verify on them.
• Furthermore, how “realist” is President Trump? He’s coy — even cutesy — concerning the Khashoggi homicide, and Mohammed bin Salman’s duty for it. “It might very properly be that the Crown Prince had information of this tragic occasion,” Trump wrote. “Perhaps he did and perhaps he didn’t!”
Oh, please. An actual realist would say, “Yeah, our buddies seized a journalist who had fled to the USA for cover; tortured him; killed him; and chopped him up into little items. So? Recover from it, cupcake.”
That’s realism, my pals. Don’t stick a toe in it. Should you’re going to be in it, be in all of it the best way.
• Do you keep in mind the person who, terribly, survived each atomic bombings? The one in Hiroshima and the one in Nagasaki? His identify was Tsutomu Yamaguchi. I considered him, I’m afraid, when seeing this (sickening) headline: “Pair survived the Las Vegas bloodbath. A California capturing took one away.” (Article right here.)
• Eager about Amazon — the corporate, not the river or the basin — I considered Rick Brookhiser. The yr was 2012. The Republican primaries and caucuses have been in full swing. Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, and others who fashion themselves “true conservatives” have been attacking Mitt Romney as a “vulture capitalist.”
Considered one of my colleagues requested Rick, “What do you assume?” He stated, quietly, with a twinkle in his eye, “I like Staples. I just like the Sports activities Authority.” These are two retailer chains during which Romney had a hand.
Rick’s easy and few phrases spoke volumes.
Just lately, Amazon has come beneath livid assault. I’m positive that a few of that assault is justified. What firm, particularly one so giant, is freed from sin? But I regard Amazon as one thing of a miracle — similar because the Sears catalogue was for an earlier era. I discover myself grateful for it.
I additionally marvel: All of the individuals who assault Amazon — do they use it? I guess they do, lots of them. They usually’re proper.
(“Individuals vote with their ft,” goes an previous saying.)
• Shall we now have somewhat language? In 1957, grammar took a blow in America. A recreation present appeared referred to as “Who Do You Belief?” It was hosted by Johnny Carson, who would go on to higher fame on The Tonight Present. Grammatically talking, the title ought to have been “Whom Do You Belief?” However tv was letting its hair down.
I considered this when taking a look at Twitter — which provides you some recommendation: “Who to comply with.” I can’t pressure my mouth to say that. It needs to be “whom.” However diff’lease strokes, diff’lease mouths …
• Okay, this subsequent merchandise might trigger some controversy (just like the previous ones, truly) — however I simply don’t care. You understand how some black People are freer — looser-tongued, extra candid — about race than different individuals are?
I liked Darius Slay, the Detroit Lions cornerback, on Christian McCaffrey, the Carolina Panthers operating again. Let me quote a narrative within the Detroit Free Press:
… Slay marveled at McCaffrey’s talents Thursday, and at how totally different he’s from different NFL operating backs.
“I simply by no means noticed a white man do it like that,” Slay stated. “He goes ham on the market and like he performs on an elite degree on the operating again. (Most) white operating backs (are recognized for) operating people over, he be on the market shaking them and doing all what he must do, and catch it within the air. So he’s particular. He’s particular.”
The sheer freedom of that statement. The sheer unafraidness. I’ve all the time favored Darius Slay — “Huge Play” Slay — and like him much more now …
• Talking of soccer: My school staff, the College of Michigan, took a horrible shellacking towards Ohio State on Saturday. The rating was 62 to 39. I learn two astounding details.
Michigan had not given up that many factors — in a regulation recreation — because the 19th century. (The yr was 1891, versus Cornell.) Additionally: In its 5 video games to date this season, the Michigan basketball staff has not given up as many as 62 factors. Actually.
My associates and I’ve spent hours analyzing and speaking about this recreation. And I want to make a remark which will appear (a) weak, (b) mistaken, and (c) exculpatory of Michigan.
Within the late 1980s and early 1990s, my golf pals had an expression: “gourding.” It got here from “to play out of your gourd.” And that meant to play approach, means past your regular capabilities.
At some point, I got here again from attending a professional event and stated that a specific participant — a veteran — had putted the lights out. Jaime Ojeda, of the College of Michigan golf staff, stated, “Then he gourded. He’s not that good a putter.”
(Jaime was, and is, I’m positive, an exquisite man, and had nice slang.)
I’ll present a pair extra examples:
“Man, I simply noticed that Joe Blow of Mississippi State shot 65 within the Chapel Hill Invitational!” “Oh, I do know Joe. He’s simply a mean participant. Should’ve gourded.”
“How’d you do yesterday, Mike?” “Oh, it was nice, man. I completely gourded.”
And so forth.
I consider that Ohio State, as a group, gourded — and gourded at precisely the proper time. On the similar time, the Michigan group was down, down.
What’s the other of “gourded”? I don’t know. “Tanked”?
It’s attainable to overanalyze a recreation, particularly a loss. Coaches will inform you this. I don’t imply to comb Michigan’s weaknesses underneath the rug. And I definitely don’t imply to slight Ohio State. However perhaps there aren’t huge classes to attract. Perhaps OSU merely gourded, in a big-time — no, historic — means.
See you sports activities followers, and different followers! Thanks for becoming a member of me.